LPI Capital Berhad 2QFY25 Results Review: A Stable Quarter
Revised Target Price RM15.70 (from RM15.25)
RETURN STATISTICS
Price @ 18 August 2025 (RM) | 14.74 |
Expected share price return (%) | +6.5 |
Expected dividend yield (%) | +6.0 |
Expected total return (%) | +12.5 |
To Conclude
Decent set of earnings, as forecasted.
Our Verdict
The prospect of special dividends remains the most exciting aspect of LPI, as its fundamental outlook seems unremarkable for now. Do be wary of a possible share price decline after the special dividend distribution.
Valuations
Current P/BV of 2.55x is inexpensive compared to the 10-year P/BV mean of 2.79x.
LPI is now trading at a forward FY26F P/BV of 2.31x with a 6.0% dividend yield.
Yays
- 1. Disposal of Public Bank shares implies a special dividend payout, though details on payout timings remain unclear.
- 2. Collaborative efforts between LPI and Public Bank could translate to higher cost savings and operating efficiency.
- 3. Possible investment income windfall in subsequent quarters.
Nays
- 1. High degree of competitiveness within the industry.
- 2. Milder residential mortgage loan growth could imply slower growth of higher-margin fire premiums.
Okays
- 1. GWP growth rate is similar to that of the wider industry.
LPI CAPITAL BHC, ID, FEMC 14.740-0.160 (-10)
Data points: 14.740, 14.230, 13.790, 13.250, 11.200, 12.530
Price performance (%)
Absolute | Relative | |
---|---|---|
1 month | 2.1 | -1.1 |
3 months | 1.4 | 3.5 |
12 months | 20.0 | 22.9 |
INVESTMENT STATISTICS
FYE Dec | FY25F | FY26F | FY27F |
---|---|---|---|
Core NP (RM m) | 387 | 415 | 442 |
CNP growth (%) | 3 | 7 | 7 |
Div yield (%) | 5.6 | 6.0 | 6.4 |
Gross DPS (sen) | 82.5 | 88.5 | 94.4 |
P/BV (x) | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
BVPS (RM) | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.5 |
ROE (%) | 15.8 | 16.5 | 17.2 |
% Street CNP (%) | 98 | 101 | 101 |
KEY STATISTICS
FBM KLCI | 1,584.96 |
Issue shares (m) | 398.4 |
Estimated free float (%) | 91.8 |
Market Capitalisation (RM’m) | 5,935.9 |
52-wk price range | RM12.4-RM15.3 |
3-mth average daily volume (m) | 0.0 |
3-mth average daily value (RM’m) | 0.7 |
Top Shareholders (%)
Public Bank | 44.2 |
Public Mutual Bhd | 8.5 |
Sompo Holdings, Inc | 4.7 |
Samuel Woo
samuelwoo.cy@midf.com.my
03-2173 8461
▼ 6MFY25’s Combined ratio of 76.4% up +2.9%yoy. The higher figure was largely due to higher claims and management expenses ratio.
▲ 2QFY25’s Combined ratio of 75.2% down -2.4%qoq. This was due to a lower claims ratio and better contribution from onerous contracts line.
Forecasts unchanged. We make no changes to our earnings forecasts.
Key downside risks. (1) Weaker premium growth, (2) Higher reinsurance charges, (3) Higher insurance expenses.
Maintain BUY call: Revised GGM-TP of RM 15.70 (from RM15.25). The TP is based on a revised FY26F P/BV of 2.46x (formerly 2.45x, rolled on from FY25F), to reflect altered earnings prospects and ROE-based valuations.
(GGM assumptions: FY26F ROE of 16.5%, LTG of 4.0% & COE of 9.1%)
FYE Dec (RM m) | 2Q FY25 | 1Q FY25 | 2Q FY24 | Yoy (%) | Qoq (%) | 1H FY25 | 1H FY24 | Yoy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insurance revenue | 483 | 466 | 443 | 9 | 4 | 948 | 866 | 10 |
Insurance service expenses | (346) | (224) | (322) | 8 | 54 | (570) | (567) | 1 |
Reinsurance expenses | (49) | (163) | (33) | 49 | -70 | (213) | (123) | 73 |
Insurance service result | 87 | 79 | 88 | -1 | 11 | 166 | 176 | -6 |
Investment return | 36 | 54 | 24 | 51 | -34 | 90 | 75 | 19 |
Net finance result | (10) | (10) | (9) | 7 | -3 | (20) | (18) | 9 |
Net inv & financial result | 113 | 123 | 103 | 10 | -8 | 236 | 233 | 1 |
Other income | 1 | 3 | 1 | n.m. | n.m. | 4 | 3 | n.m. |
OPEX and finance costs | (6) | (6) | (4) | n.m. | n.m. | (11) | (9) | n.m. |
Associates | 0 | 0 | 1 | n.m. | n.m. | 0 | 1 | n.m. |
PBT | 109 | 120 | 101 | 8 | -10 | 229 | 228 | 0 |
Tax | (25) | (22) | (23) | 12 | 15 | (47) | (49) | -2 |
NCI | – | – | – | n.m. | n.m. | – | – | n.m. |
Reported NP | 83 | 98 | 78 | 7 | -15 | 181 | 179 | 1 |
Core NP | 83 | 98 | 78 | 7 | -15 | 181 | 179 | 1 |
Gross DPS (sen) | 30.0 | – | 30.0 | n.m. | n.m. | 30.0 | 30.0 | n.m. |
Core EPS (sen) | 20.9 | 24.6 | 19.6 | 7 | -15 | 45.5 | 45.0 | 1 |
Ratios (%) | 2Q FY25 | 1Q FY25 | 2Q FY24 | Yoy (ppts) | Qoq (ppts) | 1H FY25 | 1H FY24 | Yoy (ppts) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROE (Ann.) | 14.2 | 17.1 | 13.9 | 0.3 | -2.9 | 15.4 | 16.0 | -0.5 |
Underwriting margin | 18.1 | 16.9 | 19.9 | -1.9 | 1.2 | 17.5 | 20.4 | -2.9 |
Combined (As reported) | 75.2 | 77.6 | 73.6 | 1.6 | -2.4 | 76.4 | 73.5 | 2.9 |
Claims | 43.9 | 45.7 | 44.3 | -0.4 | -1.8 | 44.8 | 42.2 | 2.6 |
Mgmt expenses | 21.5 | 21.2 | 18.4 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 21.3 | 19.8 | 1.5 |
Commission | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.3 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 8.2 | 8.4 | -0.2 |
Net insurance finance cost | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 0.1 | -0.2 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 0.2 |
Onerous contracts | (1.6) | (0.9) | (0.5) | -1.1 | -0.7 | (1.3) | -1.3 |
By Segment (RM m) | 2Q FY25 | 1Q FY25 | 2Q FY24 | Yoy (%) | Qoq (%) | 1H FY25 | 1H FY24 | Yoy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total GWP | 459 | 569 | 432 | 6 | -19 | 1,028 | 964 | 7 |
Fire | 182 | 231 | 179 | 2 | -21 | 413 | 389 | 6 |
Motor | 114 | 122 | 102 | 12 | -6 | 236 | 216 | 9 |
MAT | 29 | 29 | 30 | -2 | -0 | 59 | 64 | -8 |
Misc | 133 | 187 | 121 | 10 | -29 | 321 | 295 | 9 |
Total Ins. service result | 87 | 79 | 88 | -1 | 11 | 166 | 176 | -6 |
Fire | 56 | 40 | 62 | -10 | 39 | 96 | 126 | -24 |
Motor | 2 | 19 | 8 | -81 | -92 | 21 | 7 | 191 |
MAT | 3 | 1 | (1) | -384 | 178 | 4 | (1) | -344 |
Misc | 20 | 18 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 38 | 45 | -14 |
Source: Company, MBSBR
Description of bars (approximate values):
- t-1 (Initial): 98
- Insurance rev.: +17 (to 115)
- Insurance exp.: -122 (to -7)
- Reinsurance exp.: -18 (to -25)
- Inv. & finance result: +114 (to 89)
- Everything else: -5 (to 84)
- t (Final): 83
Source: Company, MBSBR
Description of bars (approximate values):
- t-1 (Initial): 78
- Insurance rev.: +39 (to 117)
- Insurance exp.: -24 (to 93)
- Reinsurance exp.: -16 (to 77)
- Inv. & finance result: +11 (to 88)
- Everything else: -5 (to 83)
- t (Final): 83
Source: Company, MBSBR
Description of bars (approximate values):
- t-1 (Initial): 179
- Insurance rev.: +82 (to 261)
- Insurance exp.: -90 (to 171)
- Reinsurance exp.: -3 (to 168)
- Inv. & finance result: +13 (to 181)
- Everything else: -1 (to 180)
- t (Final): 181
Source: Company, MBSBR
Insurance revenue: 443, 423, 462, 466, 483 (1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25)
Insurance expense: -245, -322, -252, -239, -224, -346
Reinsurance expense: -33, -49, -90, -133, -163, -90
Investment & finance result: 42, 14, 42, 8, 44, 26
Everything else: -29, -25, -30, -24, -25, -30
Core NP: 101, 78, 171, 74, 98, 83
Source: Company, MBSBR
1. Total Overall: ▲ Mediocre
Insurance Service Result (RM m)
Bars: 158, 88, 88, 90, 79, 87 (t-5 to t)
Combined Ratio (%)
Bars: 79.2, 80.1, 68.4, 80.5, 83.1, 81.9 (t-5 to t)
GWP (RM m)
Bars: 552, 432, 465, 431, 569, 459 (t-5 to t)
Commentary: Overall, a mediocre quarter with solid sequential year GWP growth. The stable combined ratio comprises a particularly high claims ratio (stemming from the fire and motor segment), but the impact was offset by a lower-than-usual reinsurance ratio.
2. Fire Overall: ▲ Mediocre
Insurance Service Result (RM m)
Bars: 64, 62, 74, 71, 40, 56 (t-5 to t)
Combined Ratio (%)
Bars: 59.3, 63.3, 57.2, 61.7, 77.9, 70.7 (t-5 to t)
GWP (RM m)
Bars: 210, 179, 163, 183, 231, 182 (t-5 to t)
Commentary: A higher claims ratio resulted in a higher combined ratio, weighing down on the insurance service result.
3. Motor Overall: ▼ Weak
Insurance Service Result (RM m)
Bars: 19.3, 8.1, 12.1, 5.8, -0.9, 1.5 (t-5 to t)
Combined Ratio (%)
Bars: 100.8, 92.6, 89.4, 95.0, 83.1, 98.7 (t-5 to t)
GWP (RM m)
Bars: 120, 114, 102, 122, 122, 114 (t-5 to t)
Commentary: Unfortunately, a combination of high claims and reinsurance ratios resulted in a very weak insurance service result.
4. MAT Overall: ▲ Strong
Insurance Service Result (RM m)
Bars: -0.5, -0.9, 1.4, 0.8, 0.9, 2.6 (t-5 to t)
Combined Ratio (%)
Bars: 101.9, 103.5, 94.9, 97.0, 96.8, 88.6 (t-5 to t)
GWP (RM m)
Bars: 34, 30, 21, 21, 29, 29 (t-5 to t)
Commentary: A negative claims ratio provided some offset to a reinsurance ratio that was on the higher end.
5. Misc Overall: ▲ Mediocre
Insurance Service Result (RM m)
Bars: 26, 19, 24, 28, 18, 20 (t-5 to t)
Combined Ratio (%)
Bars: 80.7, 86.3, 82.7, 79.2, 87.0, 86.7 (t-5 to t)
GWP (RM m)
Bars: 174, 121, 162, 105, 187, 133 (t-5 to t)
Commentary: Lower reinsurance charges provided some offset to a high claim’s ratio.
Source: Company, MBSBR
GWP (RM mil) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 210, 179, 183, 182, 231, 182
- Motor: 105, 114, 102, 122, 122, 114
- MAT: 34, 30, 21, 29, 29, 29
- Misc: 174, 121, 105, 133, 187, 158
- Total: 532, 432, 465, 431, 569, 459
Source: Company, MBSBR
Insurance Service Result (RM mil) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 64, 62, 74, 71, 40, 56
- Motor: 8, 12, 6, 2, 19, 2
- MAT: 1, 1, 1, -1, 1, 3
- Misc: 26, 19, 24, 28, 18, 20
- Total: 88, 88, 90, 79, 79, 87
Source: Company, MBSBR
Insurance Revenue (RM mil) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 157, 170, 172, 186, 182, 190
- Motor: 105, 109, 114, 117, 115, 119
- MAT: 29, 26, 27, 26, 29, 23
- Misc: 133, 139, 140, 134, 140, 151
- Total: 423, 443, 462, 466, 466, 483
Source: Company, MBSBR
Insurance & Reinsurance Expenses (RM mil) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 93, 107, 99, 115, 142, 134
- Motor: 106, 101, 102, 111, 95, 117
- MAT: 29, 27, 26, 25, 28, 20
- Misc: 107, 120, 116, 106, 122, 131
- Total: 335, 355, 342, 372, 387, 395
Source: Company, MBSBR
Combined ratio (%) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 59, 63, 62, 57, 78, 71
- Motor: 101, 93, 89, 95, 99, 83
- MAT: 102, 104, 95, 97, 97, 89
- Misc: 81, 86, 83, 79, 87, 87
- Total: 79, 80, 68, 81, 83, 82
Source: Company, MBSBR
Claims ratio (%) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 37, 4, 12, 21, 24, -1
- Motor: 72, 64, 65, 57, 49, 65
- MAT: 21, -23, -16, -114
- Misc: 41, 43, 30, 37, 72, 33
- Total: 49, 29, 28, 24, 47, 24
Source: Company, MBSBR
Reinsurance ratio (%) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 34, 30, 29, 35, 24, 6
- Motor: 4, 3, 12, 8, 8, 0
- MAT: 58, 102, 195, -31, -37, 85
- Misc: 31, 21, 16, 29, 23, -12
- Total: 21, 7, 18, 29, 35, 10
Source: Company, MBSBR
Expense ratio (%) by segment for 1Q FY24, 2Q FY24, 3Q FY24, 4Q FY24, 1Q FY25, 2Q FY25.
- Fire: 27, 21, 21, 22, 22, 23
- Motor: 25, 26, 25, 26, 26, 25
- MAT: 17, 19, 16, 18, 16, 20
- Misc: 26, 24, 24, 20, 26, 26
- Total: 25, 23, 21, 24, 24, 24
Source: Company, MBSBR
Ratio components (%)
Ratio components (%) | 1Q FY24 | 2Q FY24 | 3Q FY24 | 4Q FY24 | 1Q FY25 | 2Q FY25 | 1H FY24 | 1H FY25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (Reported) | ||||||||
Combined ratio | 73.4 | 73.6 | 66.8 | 75.1 | 77.6 | 75.2 | 73.5 | 76.4 |
Claims | 40.1 | 44.3 | 35.8 | 41.5 | 45.7 | 43.9 | 42.2 | 44.8 |
Mgmt expenses | 21.2 | 18.4 | 19.1 | 19.8 | 21.2 | 21.5 | 19.8 | 21.3 |
Commission | 8.4 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.4 | 8.2 |
Net insurance finance cost | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Onerous contracts | 0.6 | (0.5) | 0.5 | 2.0 | (0.9) | (1.6) | – | (1.3) |
Total (Our estimates) | ||||||||
Combined ratio | 79.2 | 80.1 | 68.4 | 80.5 | 83.1 | 81.9 | 79.6 | 82.5 |
Claims | 32.6 | 49.4 | 29.3 | 27.9 | 24.3 | 47.5 | 41.2 | 36.1 |
Reinsurance | 21.2 | 7.5 | 17.9 | 28.9 | 35.0 | 10.2 | 14.2 | 22.4 |
Expense | 25.4 | 23.1 | 21.1 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 24.2 | 24.3 | 24.0 |
Fire (Our estimates) | ||||||||
Combined ratio | 59.3 | 63.3 | 57.2 | 61.7 | 77.9 | 70.7 | 61.4 | 74.2 |
Claims | (1.0) | 36.5 | 4.0 | 12.2 | 20.8 | 24.3 | 18.5 | 22.6 |
Reinsurance | 33.7 | 5.5 | 30.3 | 28.9 | 35.2 | 23.9 | 19.0 | 29.4 |
Expense | 26.6 | 21.2 | 22.9 | 20.6 | 21.9 | 22.4 | 23.8 | 22.2 |
Motor (Our estimates) | ||||||||
Combined ratio | 100.8 | 92.6 | 89.4 | 95.0 | 83.1 | 98.7 | 96.6 | 91.1 |
Claims | 71.8 | 63.6 | 65.0 | 56.8 | 49.3 | 65.4 | 67.6 | 57.5 |
Reinsurance | 3.7 | 3.4 | (0.5) | 12.0 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 3.6 | 8.1 |
Expense | 25.3 | 25.5 | 24.8 | 26.1 | 25.5 | 25.4 | 25.4 | 25.5 |
MAT (Our estimates) | ||||||||
Combined ratio | 101.9 | 103.5 | 94.9 | 97.0 | 96.8 | 88.6 | 102.7 | 93.2 |
Claims | 115.2 | 122.5 | 20.9 | (23.2) | (114.0) | (16.2) | 118.6 | (71.1) |
Reinsurance | (30.6) | (37.4) | 57.6 | 101.9 | 194.9 | 84.8 | (33.9) | 146.6 |
Expense | 17.3 | 18.5 | 16.3 | 18.3 | 16.0 | 19.9 | 17.9 | 17.7 |
Misc (Our estimates) | ||||||||
Combined ratio | 80.7 | 86.3 | 82.7 | 79.2 | 87.0 | 86.7 | 83.6 | 86.8 |
Claims | 23.4 | 40.5 | 42.8 | 29.5 | 37.2 | 72.2 | 32.2 | 55.4 |
Reinsurance | 31.4 | 21.3 | 16.0 | 29.4 | 23.5 | (11.7) | 26.2 | 5.3 |
Expense | 25.9 | 24.4 | 23.9 | 20.2 | 26.4 | 26.1 | 25.1 | 26.2 |
Source: Company, MBSBR
INCOME STATEMENT | FY23 | FY24 | FY25F | FY26F | FY27F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insurance revenue | 1,782 | 1,782 | 1,920 | 2,096 | 2,244 |
Insurance service expenses | (827) | (1,058) | (1,155) | (1,257) | (1,352) |
Reinsurance expense | (661) | (346) | (379) | (412) | (438) |
Insurance service result | 294 | 378 | 386 | 427 | 453 |
Investment return | 149 | 146 | 149 | 144 | 153 |
Net finance result | (32) | (39) | (39) | (39) | (39) |
Net investment & financial result | 117 | 107 | 110 | 105 | 114 |
Total ins, inv & financial result | 411 | 485 | 497 | 532 | 567 |
Other income | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Other OPEX and finance costs | (21) | (18) | (18) | (18) | (18) |
Associates | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
PBT | 395 | 474 | 487 | 523 | 557 |
Tax | (81) | (97) | (100) | (108) | (115) |
NCI | – | – | – | – | – |
Reported NP | 314 | 377 | 387 | 415 | 442 |
Core NP | 314 | 377 | 387 | 415 | 442 |
FINANCIAL RATIOS | FY23 | FY24 | FY25F | FY26F | FY27F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYE Dec (RM m) | |||||
Profitability (%) | |||||
ROE | 14.0 | 16.0 | 15.8 | 16.5 | 17.2 |
ROA | 6.7 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 8.4 |
Combined ratio (%) | |||||
Combined ratio | 83.5 | 78.8 | 79.9 | 79.6 | 79.8 |
Claims | 23.7 | 35.5 | 36.4 | 36.2 | 36.5 |
Expense | 22.7 | 23.9 | 23.8 | 23.7 | 23.7 |
Reinsurance | 37.1 | 19.4 | 19.7 | 19.7 | 19.5 |
Growth (%) | |||||
Insurance revenue | 16.1 | -0.0 | 7.8 | 9.2 | 7.0 |
Insurance expense | -34.4 | 27.9 | 9.2 | 8.8 | 7.6 |
Insurance service result | 2.7 | 28.6 | 2.3 | 10.5 | 6.1 |
PBT | 15.6 | 20.1 | 2.7 | 7.3 | 6.6 |
Core NP | 24.4 | 20.2 | 2.6 | 7.3 | 6.6 |
Valuation metrics | |||||
Core EPS (sen) | 78.7 | 94.7 | 97.1 | 104.2 | 111.0 |
Gross DPS (sen) | 66.0 | 80.0 | 82.5 | 88.5 | 94.4 |
Div payout (%) | 84 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 |
BVPS (RM) | 5.7 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.5 |
Core P/E (x) | 18.7 | 15.6 | 15.2 | 14.1 | 13.3 |
Div yield (%) | 4.5 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 6.0 | 6.4 |
P/BV (x) | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
BALANCE SHEET | FY23 | FY24 | FY25F | FY26F | FY27F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYE Dec (RM m) | |||||
Cash & ST funds | 315 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
Reinsurance contracts | 878 | 880 | 977 | 1,084 | 1,204 |
Investment securities | 3,167 | 3,559 | 3,241 | 3,284 | 3,329 |
Other assets | 209 | 196 | 592 | 627 | 659 |
Total assets | 4,569 | 4,785 | 4,960 | 5,145 | 5,341 |
Insurance contracts | 2,200 | 2,257 | 2,370 | 2,488 | 2,613 |
Other liabilities | 86 | 106 | 110 | 114 | 119 |
Total liabilities | 2,286 | 2,363 | 2,480 | 2,602 | 2,732 |
Share capital | 398 | 398 | 398 | 398 | 398 |
Reserves | 1,885 | 2,024 | 2,082 | 2,144 | 2,211 |
Total equity | 2,284 | 2,422 | 2,480 | 2,543 | 2,609 |
Total L&E | 4,569 | 4,785 | 4,960 | 5,145 | 5,341 |
Source: Company, MBSBR
This report has been prepared by MBSB Investment Bank Berhad (formerly known as MIDF AMANAH INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD) 197501002077 (24878-X).
(Bank Pelaburan) (A Participating Organisation of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad)
It is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. Readers should be fully aware that this report is for information purposes only. The opinions contained in this report are based on information obtained or derived from sources that we believe are reliable. MBSB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD (formerly known as MIDF AMANAH INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD) makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained therein and it should not be relied upon as such. This report is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments. The analysis contained herein is based on numerous assumptions. Different assumptions could result in materially different results. All opinions and estimates are subject to change without notice. The research analysts will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of MBSB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD (formerly known as MIDF AMANAH INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD). The directors, employees and representatives of MBSB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD (formerly known as MIDF AMANAH INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD) may have an interest in any of the securities mentioned and may benefit from the information herein. Members of the MBSB Group and their affiliates may provide services to any company and affiliates of such companies whose securities are mentioned herein This document may not be reproduced, distributed or published in any form or for any purpose.
STOCK RECOMMENDATIONS
BUY Total return is expected to be >10% over the next 12 months.
TRADING BUY The stock price is expected to rise by >10% within 3 months after a Trading Buy rating has been assigned due to positive news flow.
NEUTRAL Total return is expected to be between -10% and +10% over the next 12 months.
SELL Total return is expected to be <-10% over the next 12 months.
TRADING SELL The stock price is expected to fall by >10% within 3 months after a Trading Sell rating has been assigned due to negative news flow.
SECTOR RECOMMENDATIONS
POSITIVE The sector is expected to outperform the overall market over the next 12 months.
NEUTRAL The sector is to perform in line with the overall market over the next 12 months.
NEGATIVE The sector is expected to underperform the overall market over the next 12 months.
ESG RECOMMENDATIONS* – source Bursa Malaysia and FTSE Russell
★★★★ Top 25% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
★★★ Top 26-50% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
★★ Top 51%- 75% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
★ Bottom 25% by ESG Ratings amongst PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell
* ESG Ratings of PLCs in FBM EMAS that have been assessed by FTSE Russell in accordance with FTSE Russell ESG Ratings Methodology